Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Red week of Angels

I leave you with the weekly compilation of the best of the rojosfera. This week, to hands of the partner Angels:


I gather the Viul testimony in a red week that has remained abridged, in fact, to a long and intense weekend in which they emphasize three fundamental elements:

- the madness (that seems already irreversible) of the Cabinet and the measurements "elucubradas" last Friday;

- the march against the Seseña corruption to Madrid;

- and the Social Forum celebrated in Madrid and in Barcelona with participation of distint@s compañer@s of IloveI. Nevertheless, the first topic takes most of comments:

The episode demencial of the government.

pensionistas.jpg The Fridays measurements of the Cabinet cry out to the sky. Already on Wednesday our friend bloguero RGAlmazá n was moving forward to us from his Kabila the desires of the management one, of the benefit societies of insurances and: how not! of the Spanish Bank, in: Go three paws for a bank!. And the one that it warns is not a traitor, because on Friday these perverse desires were fulfilled to a great extent. At a few hours of the breakage, in Flies in the Soup the colors were extracting him to the minister Corbacho, clock in hand:" The four and twenty and Corbacho without resigning". For his part, Hugo treated also about the topic concluding with an incisive notice for navigators and affirming that the Spanish socialist party is in suicidal way, while Alberto Garzón gets overturned in the pedagogics and wonders, Socratically: Really are the pensions in danger?. From the Basque Country, Mikel Arana, sees more and more background the retirement age, and perhaps, as summary, be able to propose the opinion of Antonio Rodríguez to the effect that, of following like that the things, the exit of the crisis will not be social.

I know already, either know that the Friday right and the topic of the pensions has taken half of the selection (and I still have remained with desire of quoting otr@s compañer@s, therefore I recommend to them a walk along the agregador of IloveIU), but more the Government of our rights wants to take...

Nevertheless, margin stays to do the selection of the blogs that treat others two topics that he was announcing to them:

marcha-sesena.jpg

On the march against the corruption:

Izquierda Unida has known also this weekend to extract breast, to denounce the corruption without hair in the language, and to defend Manuel Fuentes, mayor of Seseña, although some of them used enclosed Facebook (according to account Pedro Mellado) to be opposed with too many bragging and to paint the portrait in sepia between of those who were not supporting the march not Manuel Fuentes.

Nevertheless, the call has been a success, as also it values it proper Manuel Fuentes interviewed in the blog of ceronegativo, who waited shortly leaves steadfastness with how this one filled tomorrow the Cultural club up to the flag (in this case, red and republican). A kind invitation to feel the pride to belong to IU is found by us also, with photos of the march, in nonentities.

Social forum in Madrid and Barcelona:

fscat-014-red.jpg To coast also of being too pride (but they know already that if there is something good, sure that someone adds pepper to him saying that it is a sin), I cannot allow recommending The Shoplifter, where Toni Barbarà explains the health workshop in the FSCat, and it celebrates that the association of citizens and city dwellers Dempeus per Salut Pública (that good war has given in spite of his young age) fulfills today, on January 31, his first year of life. And although it seems to past bull, do not also get lost the promotional video of the Social Forum of Madrid that they can see in The dAv blog! d. What is denounced in the same one does not have, for the time being, expiry date.

And since we cannot forget Haiti, I leave them with the recipe of a succulent united cake done by David Montilla (that I know, nothing to see with the President) and his son.

And the next week, more and better, in Kabila.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

In Chamberí they are satisfied

Go, go and see.

Seseña as example of the politics

He was commenting to you on another day that had intention of taking part in the march against the corruption. And this way I did.
Hugo says, that the march had a little of assertiveness of the militancy. And it has reason great. The fact that the PP, the Spanish socialist party, UPyD and many other political organizations neither have wanted to join the march, they have not even showed if he wants his support, it gives good sample of the political characterization of every organization.
For IU, not as for the PP-PSOE-UPyD, etc, the struggle against the corruption is something priority. Not only priority, it is something real. Few cases of corruption that we have had, quickly have put themselves in quarantine. And when it has been necessary to expel them, they have been expelled.
Even the Spanish socialist party had the audacity of criticizing the march against the corruption.
In other parties they have to catch you in fraganti with the cart of the ice creams, so that perhaps they open informative records to you.
I have a partner who says that we do little proselytism. It is right. As the courtyard is, is the moment to say again that we not all are equal, that we all commit our mistakes, but that there are mistakes and mistakes.
The initiative of the march against the corruption, I think that it has been a success. It might have been better, undoubtedly, but bearing in mind that it is the first time in many years that we mount a soirée of this type, we can be satisfied.
The IU militancy wants to take the street again.
And an extracted perception is not of anything. The march was ending in the cultural club of Madrid. It is not that it was not taking a soul in the cultural club, the fact is that there were tens persons who had to remain out.
This blog is not acritico with anything, therefore I am not thinking about being an oficialista suspect in any place. So I can give peacefully the congratulations to which the inicitiva occurred, to who exist currado from the beginning and those that they it turned into a question of the whole organization.
To all of them / expert, was useful to do a request to them: We want more.
It notices: As always, the zeros have several reportages of photos and videos very finished for all / expert that one / expert that you could not go. Like someone again Pedro Mellado, it joined this fashion.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Letter to The Country

Dear advocate of the reader of The Country:
I read wonderingly that according to a survey that you have entrusted to the company Metroscopia, which usually does the opinion polls that you publish, the PP apmplía his advantage on the Spanish socialist party in almost 6 percentage difference points.
Also I can go so far as to know the level of acceptance of the politics exercised by the government and the principal opposition camp. Or the one whom there create the interrogated persons that it is going to gain the next elections.
Thanks to this article of Fernando Garea, http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/PSOE/acelera/caida/elpepunac/20100207elpepinac_2/Tes, I can know that 64 % of interrogated persons disapproves the management of the Executive, that 76 % says to entrust little or not at all in him and that also it coincides with percentage with those who think that Shoemaker takes decisions about the march.
It be fixed that knowing all that, what I do not know is what thinks 19,1 % of this country. And I do not know it because I understand that the desire does not give to you of publishing it.
According to his study, we do not know the one who would vote for almost 20 % of Spanish. Not only we do not know the card técina, which gives what to think very much on the transparence of the above mentioned survey, if not that we see cercenada the vote option closely of 2,3 million Spanish.
With the winds that run, they should not despise 20 % of the population, since with the multitude of mass media that exist, perhaps they might lose 20 % of readership.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

The real move of the government and the management one

In the week that the government announces, between other things, the pensionazo to us; the increase of the retirement age of the 65 to the 67, Delphi, a car company that has head office in Andalusia, announces that he is going to preretire the workpeople who are 50 years.
The move is very good.
Without knowing the labor Delphi conditions, I can do to the idea of that sure that the workpeople who patrol 48 years in this company, must have a few acceptable conditions as the courtyard is.
What will Delphi do, and like her, thousands of companies carroñeras of this country? With the new measures that the government tries to take, he will preretire workpeople who have moderately worthy working conditions, and will hire lads that he could dismiss instead of for 45 days for 33.
Fix you in detail in what happens: the government says that it lows the price of the dismissal from 45 to 33 years to encourage the work in the young people. The company, it takes and preretires workpeople to the 50. As the company has to keep on producing (after you see as you believe that these mansions are paid), it hires these new lads, who have less rights and go out cheaper.
The state gets angry, because he says that there is greatly drone sucking of the boat, and that it is necessary to raise the pensions to 67 years so that it does not break the pensions system. Onlooker, when the state might not give the good one to the early retirement of 50 years. But then the jugadada would not go out well.
What is the result of all this?
Since a few jobs that had a few relatively worthy conditions, have turned into a few precarious positions, and therefore many other profitable ones. Where earlier there was one / to trabajdor/a to the one that was more difficult to dismiss, that for years employed at the company sure that did not have bad salary, which had a claim culture.... now we will have to one / to chavalito/a to the one that it is possible to dismiss in an easier way (to the cheapest being), which will have a much lower salary, which for fear of being dismissed (since now it is easier to dismiss the young people) will be much less avenging and which above will have been to be working even the 67.
Who has gone out winning and who has gone out losing in this move?
For whom is ZP governing?
And the worst thing of everything is that they will say to us that this measurement is to encourage the employment, and we will believe it.

Red week of kabila

From Kabila, taking the Àngels relief, here I leave them with the selection of the week of IloveIU:

Fix one of the topics it has been the called pensionazo, on him several blogueros have written. Alberto with rigor and knowledge has written from his Altereconomía. Also they it have done some of our institutional charges. It is the case of Nuet, Fat person and Mikel Arana, between others.

There are topics that are always white hot for the left. Especially when they are in danger the decisions that take and one tries to give reverse gears with privatizations. This way Àngels tells us how it sees Swampy soils the future of the Health, Windows speaks of reinforcing a minimum for Education and Leolo does a comparison wise and documented on the way that is taking the Housing with the current Basque autonomic government.

And like not, there is always big worry for topics appellants like the Equality, Work exactly criticizes the absence of equality that reigns in the Real Academy. Hugo, enters another worrying topic – the corruption - and does an opportune comparison between two facts that have produced this week to themselves.

Another question mediática of the week has been the place of the ATC (euphemism for which one knows now to the nuclear cemetery), and Alvaro has spoken about it from Copse and, finally, we see how from his quarry, Fernando, tells us that the People's Party of Alpedrete, - immersed in a supposed “town-planning corruption” - he does not vote in favor of the repair of the memory of Miguel Hernández in the year of his centenary, but less evil: hallelujah, we are saved! — his mayoress admits that Franco “did some things badly”.

This has been quite this week, the next capture the witness Álvaro from Copse in For a three-quarter bed.

Health and Republic

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Union I Progress and Democracy (II)

I wrote a few weeks ago a post telling why UPyD did not have to cause us many headaches at electoral level.
I usually do not do futorología, I do not like playing to advinar what it can spend. But yes that I think that it is necessary to bear in mind the possible spaces that can go so far as to give in the future, to be prepared before what happens.
In Madrid we must go preparing for the institutional UPyD irruption. This party has been nourished of a speech españolista, completely emptily in many topics. The right mediática has used Rosa Díez in fronts and news about very much space, when he was criticizing the Spanish socialist party in topics related to the model of the state.
Neither in the rest of topics nor position meets them, one nor waits for them.
It is very probable that UPyD between strongly in some places. It is very probable that in Madrid voter catches city very much aguirrista discontented with Gallardón, and that in the rest of the lame community voters gallardonistas full of Aguirre. To that vote will be necessary to add him he protests and disappointed ex-voters of the Spanish socialist party.
Where is not ball going to itch? Very well, I compete a dinner to which in places where the Spanish socialist party has a speech españolista and there is no divided PP, it does not go to extract anything. Attentive to the results that the Spot will obtain in Extremadura or Castile.
What will be his trip? Very well, it is an ultraselfish party. The parties that center so much his politics on only one person have the problem that when this person disappears, or commits some fat error, they go flat. In this party nobody does shade to his leader, and who does it to himself, finishes out.
Or they change very much the things into UPyD or it will have the trip that Rosa Díez has.
While the PP was far in the surveys, in the right mediática they had court great. You interview thoroughly, fronts, minutes in radioes and televisions... But now when the PP can be close to gaining the elections, the thing changes. With the power it is not played.
In one year, after the policewomen, if the expectations are fulfilled and in some institutions of Madrid they eliminate the absolute majorities, being able UPyD to play an umpire's role, they are going to have to be defined.
And that one can become the beginning of the end. It will have that posicionarse for supporting the PP or the Spanish socialist party.
Right now they can support any of the two. But on having had to be praised by one or for other, inevitably, it is going to move away on behalf of his electorate, since it will have to center on a sector, and will begin competing openly with one of two majority parties. And there the pranks will be finished. With the power it is not played.
The PP has a clear bet for being the party of the right. It catches from the ultraright one (where is the percentage of vote extreme right-winger who exists in other countries of our environment?) up to the center.
The Spanish socialist party already loses enough votes for the left, as to lose also for the center.
Also, it will eliminate the stigma of "outsider" that it has now, since they will be visualized like one more party.
This political space, it us is very favorable to us, since we will have to 3 parties competing for the center, and will have a wide space for which to fight, the space of the left.
We must center our action on economic topics, because there it is where our difference will be seen clearly, and all his similar ones.
While we make public a clear defender of the services, of the rights of the workpeople, of the direct taxes, of a share-out of the wealth, of the environmental protection... we will be seen like a different organization, because in that UPyD, PP and Spanish socialist party scarcely have differences.